Pennsylvania Wage Lawyer Practice Tip: FLSA Settlements Should Not Contain Broad Release Language

In the past few years, federal district courts in Pennsylvania have been extremely hostile towards FLSA settlements in which the Plaintiffs release claims that extend beyond wage and hour claims. In this regard, Pennsylvania wage and hour lawyers are directed to the following examples, which we hope you will find helpful: Altnor v. Preferred Freezer Services, Inc., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92786, *34-35 (E.D. Pa. July 18, 2017); Rubbo v. PeopleScout, Inc., 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72578, *7-9 (E.D. Pa. May 11, 2017); Kraus v. PA Fit II, LLC, 155 F. Supp. 3d 516, 532-33 (E.D. Pa. 2016); Howard v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 197 F. Supp. 2d 773, 779-80 (E.D. Pa. 2016); Bettger v. Crossmark, Inc., 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7213, *22-26 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 22, 2015).
Categories: 
Related Posts
  • Worker Misclassification Task Force Releases Report with 15 Unanimous Recommendations for General Assembly Read More
  • Recent Trends in Pennsylvania Employment Law: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Continues to Broadly Define the Parameters of “Employment” Read More
  • PA Department of Labor and Industry’s Proposed PMWA Regs: Guidance Regarding Tipped Employees, and an Important Clarification for Salaried Workers Read More
/