Having represented hundreds of home health aids (HHAs), certified nurses assistants (CNAs), and visiting nurses, our firm is very familiar with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 8 A.3d 866 (Pa. 2010), which upheld the position of the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry that HHAs, CNAs, and other home health workers are entitled to overtime permium pay. In preparing a brief, I recently re-read the opinion, and, in doing so, was struck by the Suprement Court passage recognizing that the FLSA’s overtime provisions are merely a “floor” and that states, such as Pennsylvania and New Jersey may enact more generous wage and overtime laws. In particular, the following passage should will continue to come in handy for Pennsylvania and New Jersey overtime lawyers for many years to come: “While the Act’s exemption for domestic services is more limited than the federal exemption, it is permissible for a state to enact more beneficial wage and hour laws. Indeed, the federal statute establishes only a national floor under which wage protections cannot drop, but more generous protections provided by a state are not precluded.”

Categories: 
Related Posts
  • Worker Misclassification Task Force Releases Report with 15 Unanimous Recommendations for General Assembly Read More
  • Recent Trends in Pennsylvania Employment Law: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Continues to Broadly Define the Parameters of “Employment” Read More
  • PA Department of Labor and Industry’s Proposed PMWA Regs: Guidance Regarding Tipped Employees, and an Important Clarification for Salaried Workers Read More
/